Ayodhya: Justice Gogoi get annoyed on Hindu lawyer

During the hearing of the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute in Ayodhya on Thursday in the Supreme Court, at one time it seems that the courtroom is the scene of Bollywood film.

Senior advocate Rajiv Dhawan, who was pleading on behalf of the Muslim side tore the map of a book on Ayodhya.

Advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for the All India Hindu Mahasabha, was showing this map with great enthusiasm. By showing this, the Hindu Mahasabha was trying to prove in the court that Ram was born here. READ MORE

Senior advocate Vikas Singh was trying to ask permission to show that book with great enthusiasm in the court. In this case, Dhawan could not keep himself under control.

Rajiv Dhawan was angry at this and told the judges, “My Lord, why is it being shown in the court.” Is it permissible to tear this map? “The a bench headed by Chief Justice Justice Ranjan Gogoi did not say anything on it. The judge kept listening to Rajiv Dhawan’s objection and remarks.

Dr Dhawan said that one should not rely on such a map at the last moment. Dhawan requested the court not to allow this map to be shown.

Vikas Singh was telling the court that permission should be given to show the map of former IPS officer Kishore Kunal’s book “Ayodhya Revisited” and the court can trust it. Finally, Vikas Singh said that he will not ask the court to keep this map on record.

After this drama, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi told the lawyers that what kind of debate is going on? If the debate continues in this direction, then we are getting up.

After this Vikas Singh tried to handle the situation and apologized. Vikas Singh said that he always follows the discipline of the court. “After this, Dhawan tore the map in the courtroom. People were surprised in a packed courtroom full of lawyers and visitors.

The 40-day marathon hearing on the Ram Temple-Babri Masjid dispute was completed on Wednesday and it is believed that the Supreme Court will pronounce its decision in November as Chief Justice Justice Ranjan Gogoi is retiring on November 17.

This will be a historic decision. There is a dispute over the ownership of the politically sensitive Ram temple and the Babri Masjid land.

A day before the last hearing, Justice Gogoi had said that the hearing would be completed by five o’clock on Wednesday evening, but on Wednesday, the hearing was announced to be completed an hour early.

Also, the court also said that if the arguments are left, the concerned parties can give in writing within three days.

The Supreme Court issued a statement late Wednesday evening of October 16, saying that on the 17th, all the members of the constitutional bench of the five judges who are hearing the Ayodhya case will sit in the chamber.

Since Chief Justice is retiring on November 17, experts believe that the decision in this matter may come in November.

The bench is headed by the Chief Justice of India. After a long hearing that lasted for nearly 40 days, the court reserved its decision.

Originally published at https://www.mubahisa.in.