Ayodhya : Muslims dissatisfied, Owaisi said, “Five acres of land is not needed”

The Supreme Court’s verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya has expressed dissatisfaction by AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi and Muslim lawyer Zafaryab Jilani. READ MORE

Asaduddin Owaisi started his speech by thanking Rajiv Dhawan and the other people who kept the Muslim side in the Supreme Court and expressed dissatisfaction over the decision and declared the victory of faith over the facts.

He said, “Like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, I also believe that we are not satisfied with this. The Supreme Court is supreme but it is not infallible. It was said by Justice JS Verma who gave the Babri Masjid on 6 December 1992. Dropped, today the Supreme Court is telling them to start the temple work by building trust. My point is that if the mosque had not been demolished, what would the court have decided? “

Five acres of land is not required: Owaisi

Owaisi also disagreed with the verdict of giving five acres of land to the Muslim side from the apex court.

We were fighting for our legal rights. Muslim is poor and discrimination has also happened to him. But in spite of all these compulsions, the Muslim has not passed enough that he could not buy five acres of land for his house of Allah. We do not need a bailout or alms.

It has to be seen whether the Muslim Personal Law Board will accept five acres of land or not, my personal opinion is that we should reject this proposal.

The country is now on the path of Hindu Rashtra. The Sangh Parivar and BJP will use it in Ayodhya.

There was a mosque and will remain, since the Shari’a obeisance. We will tell our breeds that there was a mosque here for 500 years.

But in 1992, due to the conspiracy of the Sangh Parivar and the Congress, that mosque was martyred.

Zafaryab Jilani can consider a review petition Sunni Waqf Board lawyer Zafaryab Jilani also expressed dissatisfaction with the decision earlier.

They have said that we respect the decision of the Supreme Court but we are not satisfied. We will see what can be done on this next.

After the decision, he held a press conference. Jilani said, “While reading the verdict, the CJI referred to Secularism and the Act of Worship of 1991. He admitted that the title suits number four and five belonged to him, but he gave the entire land title suit number five (Hindu side) Gave it. “

“He made this decision under article 142. We have to see whether the 142 can be pulled to this limit.

We will understand this from other lawyers and decide whether we have to file a review petition. I appeal to the people that Maintain peace and moderation. This is not a defeat or victory for anyone. “

“We can only say that we did not expect this decision. But what to do, they will be able to tell later. While reading the Judgment, Chief Justice has said many things which will have better results in the coming time. Not criticizing every part. “

“But some things are stuck. The court said that the structure of the mosque was built by Mir Baqi, which means that the mosque was built in 1528. You are assuming the accounts of those who wrote the travelogue at that time, it says that there is a mosque with three domes here.

But they say Namaz was read, it was not written. But it is not even written that worship is being done. This argument was not understood. Our claim was for the inside part, why? Bout of the field was present in the platform first. Yet went gave five inland suits.

According to our Sharia, we can not give anyone your mosque. Can not you donate or sell? “

Iqbal Ansari, who was a party to Babri Masjid, said on the decision, “We are satisfied 200 per cent. The court made the verdict right. We have been honouring the court before and we are doing the same today.

If the government has fixed this issue then it is a good thing. We will accept what the government does. I want to tell both Hindu and Muslim brothers that the government has finished this issue and accept it.

Originally published at https://www.mubahisa.in.